Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamed Mirani


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 08:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Hamed Mirani

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG. References fail verification and are all fraudulent copyright violations. For example, The First Magazine is a copyvio of a Fab World Today article (blacklisted) and The Guardian Fox is a copyvio of an Open The News article (blacklisted as well). Also, all of these sites with the poorly written copied and pasted content seem to be all Wordpress blogs with either missing or blank About Us sections, which is a huge red flag. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:57, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Iran.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:57, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete No independent RS showing notability-- VViking Talk Edits 14:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO notability guidelines. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Missing reliable sources. TheManInTheBlackHat   (Talk)  16:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: The article is a superstub too, what in that one sentence shows notability, even without the sourcing issues? Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 18:10, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 05:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Really? Only one sentence? That doesn't prove any notability whatsoever. Don't even get me started on the references, which are not reliable whatsoever. Yoshi24517 Chat   Online  05:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DICDEF, WP:RS, and WP:BLP. Besides being too short to be a stub, it lacks reliable sources (see nom's analysis), which violates BLPO. Bearian (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.