Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamidullah Khan (Bagram captive)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Hamidullah Khan (Bagram captive)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While this article clearly meets WP:GNG, it does not seem to meet WP:BLP1E given that the subject is only notable for one event. Allan Nonymous (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Pakistan. Allan Nonymous (talk) 20:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment The consistent media coverage surrounding him makes it unclear why WP:BLP1E would be applicable in this case.--— Saqib ( talk  |  contribs ) 20:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Part 1: "Reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event." (In this case, his detainment). Allan Nonymous (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * So why do we have so many BLPs on extrajudicial prisoners of the US, who also fall under the WP:BLP1E criteria? I believe GNG take precedence. --— Saqib ( talk  |  contribs ) 07:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Usually, this is because they are notable for something they did before and or after in these cases. (For example, being a militant, or a particularly notable trial.) Allan Nonymous (talk) 21:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: I'm not sure getting wrongly arrested gets you an article. He was a 14 yr old child, who doesn't appear to have been notable otherwise. I can't find anything about him since the detention, so no lasting effects. And having an article about the individual with no other notable reason seems to go against our principles here. Oaktree b (talk) 00:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:BLP1E. LibStar (talk) 00:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.