Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton 95 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete.  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 00:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Hamilton 95
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable hoax product with poor referencing to usenet groups and self-published places. No indication of lasting impact.  MBisanz  talk 19:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Hoax product, no reliable sources. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:49, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete – Even as a hoax it was non-notable. No information can be found. ShoesssS Talk 20:13, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the nom - Poor references and a hoax product; thus making it non-notable.  Schfifty  Three  22:24, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. We66er (talk) 00:59, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.