Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hamilton Jewelers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  18:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Hamilton Jewelers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP notability of an article that has a long standing problem with undisclosed paid editors. Citations listed are purely local quotidian things like store openings, or non-notable vague industry awards. If there's some claim to notability that's been missed, this is a good opportunity for WP:TNT. Brianhe (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: Paid editors?! Sounds pretty shady. Also: WP:SOAPBOX Ceosad (talk) 04:43, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now although a better article may be made later as I easily found links at Books, News, browser, Highbeam and Newspapers Archive. SwisterTwister   talk  06:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.