Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hammed Kayode Alabi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  14:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Hammed Kayode Alabi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. Sources are bunches of unreliable, paid puffery, interviews, passing mentions, which can not align with WP:BLP. Non-notable entity. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Social science,  and Nigeria. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: The first source and the second  were quite editorial, but a bit flawless since ita all about a non notable camping. The third source here  and the fourth source here  were just interviews and doesn't credit to WP:N. The fifth source  look like a freelance writing and is generally unreliable (unreliable news web). The sixth here  is same as |the third source–interview. The paragraph,  ...became the first young African Board Member at Peace First in 2020.  is not a notable achievement and skeptically fails for the seventh source  and the eight  Obviously a blog. I haven't seen how  supports the cited statement when only the line in the source reads:  Speaking at the panel session, Kayode Alabi, the founder of Kayode Alabi Leadership and Career Initiative, noted that the organisation had been leveraging technology to enhance learning among children with disabilities and their teachers.  Source  and  seems not noteworthy and were both interviews failing WP:INTERVIEW. Without borders, I am skeptical whether this UN Transforming Education Summit is notable. Well, serving as the delegate doesn't constitute notability though it's note keep by the video in . Seemingly  is from an unreliable source Business Ghana while the delegate as claimed wasn't what I saw in  which he was placed under "Youth Intervention." Source  was same as [|source 11] still an interview that constitutes nothing but just the subject speaking anything about himself. The sixteenth source  was well to show the book title : 5 Years: 10 Lessons Life Taught Me and it was also ten tical that it was self published and fails WP:NBOOK. The seventeenth here  was a freelance article written on SUS Africa, a generally unreliable source; doesn't target the cited word and was written from a view or self made author bio at the end of a written article/work. Source  was an Amazon link which is an unreliable source that leads to the Authors Bio where none of the books presented seems notable. Self published. The next citation  is still an interview already repeated in the article and  was technically a link from "TED Bauchi" undoubtfully which was a non notable one compared to eg. Ted Euston and more. Western Union Foundation Fellowship is not regarded notable like MacArthur Fellowship, Mandela Washington Fellowship and many more. So,  fails while  was a well written one seeming sort of paid stuff and the last  was a repeated interview. From my analysis, it is also wonderful especially in articles like these when there are many sources even from reliable ones but specifically doesn't contribute to notability or cited words. A critical case of WP:LOTSOFSOURCES. All the Best!   Otuọcha   (talk) 13:10, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.