Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hammer Bro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Characters in the Mario franchise. Star  Mississippi  18:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Hammer Bro

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reception for the Hammer Bro's is absolutely terrible and sourced mainly to listicles. I don't believe there's a single reference in the article that is WP:SIGCOV. There's no reason they cannot be merged into Characters in the Mario franchise. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Video games.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:26, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge - Mostly an unsourced listing of game appearance and a reception section of the most mundane passing-mention coverage imaginable. Current coverage doesn't come close to meeting the GNG, nor would one expect to find much out there, as it's just a run of the mill minor game character. Sergecross73   msg me  21:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per Zxcvbnm Andre🚐 22:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge Wikipedia is not a directory of minor video game enemies. Dronebogus (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. InterstellarGamer12321 ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 08:05, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge many of these minor enemies are sourced to the same brief listicles. Treating them in the same Wikipedia article would do a better job following the sources, instead of splitting and stretching them with unsourced information. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge some of the article's contents into the relevant entry for Characters in the Mario franchise. Since a clear-cut solution, an appropriate merge target, was actually provided instead of a deletion rationale, not sure why the OP insists that it has to go to AfD in lieu of a bold merge or merge discussion. Haleth (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per nom. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:00, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment. Don't we have lower hanging fruit to deal with? I mean, this is stretching notability, but there are some meh-so-so sources that are in theory INDEPTH... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * It's a minor NPC character who's entire concept is easily summarized as "Turtle that throws hammers." This is about as low hanging as it gets... Sergecross73   msg me  01:48, 19 February 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.