Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hampton Place


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Drmies (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Hampton Place

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable building. Both refs (now link dead) point to developer, so it looks like there have never been any independent links. Google reveals many hits, but they all seem to be database entries or real estate agents trying to sell units in the building; I'm not seeing any in depth coverage of the building itself. It's possible there are non-English WP:RS, but none of the two non-English-wikipedia articles link to obviously independent reliable sources with in depth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 5 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable topic. TBrandley 17:47, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:05, 13 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  16:50, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with above -- Go  Phightins  !  23:47, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.