Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hampus Lindholm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. There are plenty of Swedish sources. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:30, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Hampus Lindholm

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable junior player who has yet to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Can be recreated when/if he does meet the requirements for notability. This was a disputed prod with the reasoning that he will meet NHOCKEY at the draft or next year. However that is a case of WP:CRYSTAL as anything could happen between now and the draft or next season. Such as god forbid a car accident. DJSasso (talk) 11:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. DJSasso (talk) 11:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I've added some more sources - three mock drafts - that suggests it is likely that Hampus is a first round draft selection. How is the distinction made regarding having a page for Cody Ceci, for example, and Lindholm? Are only players generally considered top five in the upcoming draft notable enough to have their own page? Is international competition important (Lindholm is currently participating in the 2012 IIHF World U18 Championships)? This season, Lindholm has split his time quite evenly between junior level and second tier professional Swedish hockey so I don't think calling him a junior player is completely fair. Also, I'm sorry if I removed the previous page deletion proposal before the matter was settled. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oh no need to apologize. That is how prod works. You did the right thing. As for Cody Ceci the only difference is that his page hadn't been noticed yet. As such he now has a prod on him as well. International competition is part of WP:NHOCKEY however it does require it to be senior competition. I agree that he is likely to meet it in a couple of months at which time the page can be undeleted but per WP:CRYSTAL we can't assume he will become notable. However if you can find enough sources to meet WP:GNG this is all moot. -DJSasso (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:29, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - per WP:GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 11:31, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * note to closing admin this keep vote is almost identical to 3 others by the same editor in 3 minute voting spree, . LibStar (talk) 04:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - I haven't searched for sources myself, so it is possible that more sources exist than are in the article right now. But I would not consider mock draft pages represent significant coverage, and so I think more sources with significant coverage are needed before this can demonstrate meeting WP:GNG. Rlendog (talk) 02:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Σ  τ  c . 00:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Meets GNG. Lots of non-routine covergae in Swedish press where he is a big name. Named the J20 SuperElit's Best Defenseman and is widely expected to be picked 1st round of NHL draft. Iftelse (talk) 02:50, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.