Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hana to Akuma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Hana to Akuma

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unnotable manga series. Fails WP:N and WP:BK. No significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Previously deleted through userification at User:Samantha Lim88/Hana to Akuma per a discussion with an admin, however a new editor recently recreated in an even worse form, and still showing no notability (nor has notability been shown for the userified version, only verification that it was published, which of course does not establish notability). -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 09:07, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 09:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Per Nom, actully the article looks like it was quickly put together and since no RS exist delete per nom. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 19:31, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Since previous Afd, the situation didn't change much. There is no evidence of notability and it's still not licensed in UK/US. However it got licensed in France by Panini Comics but it's for July 2010. It will be long wait before its receives some coverages by French RS until then it should stay in userpage. --KrebMarkt 23:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Given it's been recently licensed in the West, which makes it possible that in the near future reviews that demonstrate notability are more likely to be found, keep the userfied version but delete the current live version as failing WP:BK. —Quasirandom (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Also suggest delete as it doesn't pass N due to no RS. Basket of Puppies  23:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.