Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hananya Naftali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Opinions are numerically split, but the "keep" arguments are stronger, in that several explain why in their view there is sufficient coverage for inclusion, while these explanations are not addressed or rebutted by the "delete" side.  Sandstein  14:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Hananya Naftali

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I searched a lot, but did not find anything special, this person only writes on Twitter, there is nothing else. so basically, failed Wikipedia general notablity guideline. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Please state the policy or guideline you are relying on for your view. This is not a ballot, and your opinion will likely be ignored by the closing admin if it is stated without any policy-based backing. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen&times; &#9742;  15:47, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Israel. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 18:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Judaism and Internet.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  18:35, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable social media influencer. Fails notability guideline for biographies. Marokwitz (talk) 13:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Famous Israeli right-wing YouTuber and media influencer. Notable under the WP:GNG. As I always explain when !voting delete for social media folks: YouTubers can be notable. This is one of such exceptions. There are sources in the article, there is much more online. Just one example. gidonb (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. He is a young man so perhaps later on he might meet WP:NBLP, however currently no. With regards, Oleg Y.  (talk) 23:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Deleteas below, meet WP:NBLP --Mind-blowing blow (talk) 07:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per gidonb. Llajwa (talk) 21:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep per gidonb. Magna Frisia (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * k 2001:569:733A:9700:48A3:A084:4365:DDF6 (talk) 01:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree 100% with Oleg Y MaskedSinger (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Meets GNG,, , . WP:THREE is enough, I didn't look for more. Ref #1 opens calling the subject "prominent Israeli journalist Hananya Naftali"  // Timothy :: talk  06:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. We have WP:NBASIC/WP:GNG-level coverage of this individual, as he has been covered by multiple independent reliable sources. English-language sources include: JNS (an article about the subject) and Jewish Insider (another article about the subject), but sources that qualify towards GNG/NBASIC don't have to be in English. Some non-English coverage of Naftali can be found in Channel 7 News (about Naftali's wedding), bhol (an article about Naftali), and Kikar (a brief article about Naftali). He's also conducted an interview with YNet (though that doesn't contribute towards notability, as it's mostly just quoting him verbatim), and another with DFN. I think there's enough sourcing to write a brief but reasonably detailed encyclopedic entry about this person, and I think that this person is both fairly high-profile and notable, so I believe that keeping is the right course of action. —  Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 06:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG. Chekidalum (talk) 11:30, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.