Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hancom Office


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Merging and/or redirecting can be done editorially outside of this, there was no consensus for any specific action to be mandated out of this discussion but the door is definitely still ajar for it to happen. Daniel (talk) 11:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Hancom Office

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unsourced, likely WP:PROMO issue, no WP:GNG BrigadierG (talk) 04:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and Websites.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  04:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * comment Honestly I'm torn, looking at the links given by siroxo with a machine translation, it seems like it has a few articles which are substantially about the subject, though I question how much of it has any encyclopedic merit other than just simply acknowledging it exists. The notability seems to be just "oh hey, this exists/new version of thing" without much more coverage than that. Honestly, I want to !vote delete but it seems like it meet the standards for being notable in itself. Maybe we can merge it into the company's page.
 * DarmaniLink (talk) 05:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment.
 * 1) ZDNet Korea has a lot of coverage. Hard to evaluate which individual articles are SIGCOV but it seems likely some are.
 * 2) Seems to be a fair bit of coverage in books Again difficult to evaluate
 * &mdash;siro&chi;o 04:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: This seem like decent coverage, these are less about the software and more about the company but they provide context , . Oaktree b (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge into Hancom I dont think its notable enough to have its own article DarmaniLink (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * extremely weak keep if it's notable enough to come preinstalled, it could potentially have an article, but right now it's in a state worthy being merged. If someone wishes to improve it, ill change to a strong keep. DarmaniLink (talk) 02:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge into Hancom. I agree with above. I happened across this AfD randomly (not searching for Hancom at the time), but realize that Hancom Office came preinstalled on my Samsung phone. So it's already notable enough to be in my lap as I come across this. However, since the article is poorly written and the office suite doesn't garner much English attention on it's own, I think merging is the logical thing to do. Merging is also easily reversed in the future if the writing and references improve. —   void  xor  00:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge only sourced information into Hancom, which will probably end up being a redirect, but no objection to sourcing and merging. Checked kr.wp for sources and found nothing.  // Timothy :: talk  02:29, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.