Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Handheld Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies.  Sandstein  18:59, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Handheld Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notabale tech company. All GNews gives me is name-drops (string:"handheld group") and most of the sources cited are utterly useless, with one being dead and another being an archived press release. —A little blue Bori v^_^v  Bori! 06:47, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:35, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: Google News is terrible when it comes to Swedish news, so I get far more in sv:Mediearkivet, but most of it is still noise. It seems like most sensible sources – the ones writing actual articles, not just listing companies or copying press releases – would ignore "Group" and just call the company "Handheld", but even in a Swedish database, that's proven a bit tricky to use in a search. /Julle (talk) 20:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeek. That's a bit of an issue. Can you think of any exact-string searches that would get you news on the organisation with as little irrelevant results as possible? —A little blue Bori v^_^v  Bori! 21:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * My go-to solution in situations like these tend to be to include key people (founders, CEOs and so on) which will leave out some relevant results but at least tend to include only news about the organisation and hopefully keep in-depth coverage, but I haven't had time to dig into this. (I'm not sure it's the best solution, so if anyone reading this has any better ideas in general, please feel free to tell me on my talk page if it's not related to this discussion.) /Julle (talk) 22:45, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:19, 19 April 2019 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.