Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Handwriting foreign accent

I tried to follow along the article, the Talk page associated with it, and some of the previous edits, and for the life of me, I cannot see the value or usefulness of this (aside from its quality, which is poor -- it's already noted as needing attention. Alcarillo 18:01, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Or maybe merge with graphology? (dear god either way it needs help)Rhymeless 21:05, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. It seems to have value to me. The stuff about 7s being crossed or uncrossed sounds familiar.  But I think the article title is probably a bit of a fudge. Think needing attention seems a good place for it for now. - --bodnotbod 21:08, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, certainly, but change title. Opposed to merging with graphology, but possibly with penmanship. -- Jao 22:04, 4 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, merge with penmanship.--Samuel J. Howard 03:06, May 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think it is a quite valid topic and worthy of further attention. Don't merge it IMO. Marcika 05:40, May 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, an interesting topic, wants a better title. Not sure if penmanship,  palaeography, or diplomatics would be the closest match.  The palaeography article needs help as well, and apparently we don't have diplomatics yet.  Smerdis of Tlön 19:35, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge But mostly no true. I wirte the "I" without the bars. And I'm not Chinese.Pedro 01:51, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, but merge and/or rename. - Fennec 14:50, May 9, 2004 (UTC)