Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hang Ten!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to The Soup Dragons. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Hang Ten!

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability is neither claimed nor established for this little-known compilation album. The two sources just provided show existence but make no claims in its support. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to The Soup Dragons, and by merge I mean add a note there re. the three EPs singles that this compiles. There isn't much beyond that here. --Michig (talk) 16:50, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 *  Keep Merge and delete
 * Alternatives to deletion
 * states that if the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion.
 * I checked the history for this article and note that use of other methods of dispute resolution such as listing on Wikipedia:Requests for comments for further input as required by . or adding suitable tags was not used first.
 * It may be reasonable to merged the album into the artist's main article or discography article as per which states "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting", but this may lead to the bands article page becoming cluttered. Robcamstone (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Updated opinion: Having recheck The Soup Dragons article I note it has a basic Discography Section, which could have the information here merged with relative ease. So I have changed my vote. As the wikilink for the album Hang Ten! on The Soup Dragons would only redirect a user back to that same article, I would suggest once the infomation has been merged then the deletion could go ahead. Robcamstone (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * (nom) Merging does sound reasonable, yes. I don't personally think a track listing need be preserved for minor compilation albums, so it should cause little 'clutter'. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.