Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hangman Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Billy Childish.  MBisanz  talk 03:35, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Hangman Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A record label that fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Searches in Google News archives are not yielding significant coverage in reliable sources. I found this passing mention in Google Books (here), but it's certainly not enough to pass Wikipedia's nobability guidelines. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:40, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge to Billy Childish. This label has released many records that have received significant coverage. Like many independent labels, judging it as a business isn't sensible. This is Billy Childish's label and it has received coverage in books such as They Could Have Been Bigger than EMI. As a label that is so important to the history of Billy Childish, a merge would be indicated, but this would unbalance the Billy Childish article which is already quite large. If this was a section in the Childish article it could quite reasonably be split off into a separate article, so leave it be. --Michig (talk) 19:41, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theo polisme  15:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Merge and redirect to Billy Childish, which is where the notability is. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:41, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — cyberpower Chat Limited Access 18:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.