Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hangover (book) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 03:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Hangover (book)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book - fails to meet the requirements of WP:BK. RichardOSmith (talk) 14:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Had a quick search for sources but Google isn't bring up anything for me. Artw (talk) 14:32, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete- I am also drawing a blank on this one. HullIntegrity  \ talk / 16:04, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable book, non-notable author. Probably vanity published, probably COI on part of article creator. Keri (talk) 16:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * It doesn't appear to be vanity published. It looks like it's put out by Missing Link Press and they don't appear to charge authors anything for publishing, although they do print in extremely limited quantities. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Can't find it in WorldCat or the Library of Congress catalog, so highly unlikely to meet WP:BKTS. Altamel (talk) 21:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I performed a search using several different key words (book title, part of author's name, full author name) but really couldn't find anything to show that this book passes WP:NBOOK. I can't even find this on the main merchant sites and the absence of a listing on a merchant site doesn't mean that a book cannot be notable, it is usually fairly telling. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOK, google brings up nothing useful, has been previously nominated for delete, result was speedy delete, reason may not have been technically correct(?) but ..... maybe another helpful admin can oblige? (as a sidepoint, the author has previously removed deletion notices, are there any wikieditors who can take them under their wing??:)) Coolabahapple (talk) 23:54, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.