Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanjian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep &mdash; Caknuck 03:38, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Hanjian

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This unsourced article is a personal essay. The very topic of the article is unencyclopedic. Perhaps it can go to the Wikitionary. K.C. Tang 03:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems encyclopedic as it goes well beyond a mere definition. Well researched by many contributors over nearly two years but needs citations. A candidate for cleanup rather than deletion. Dbromage 03:49, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: Perogatory terms are notable if they define the history and the reason why they are considered perogatory this article seems to establish those things. it just needs sourcing. Deathawk 21:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Many of the articles under the category "Pejorative terms for people" are problematic. We should always assume good faith, but sometimes reading those articles we can't help wondering what the point is to create (and keep) such unsourced ramblings. Btw, I can't agree the article in question is "well researched". I can only hope that the admins could look at this type of article more carefully.--K.C. Tang 02:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is about an encyclopedic topic, as the term references a specific type of traitor. Ngchen 17:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.