Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hankook Pizza Hut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 09:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Hankook Pizza Hut
A grammatically-challenged article about a local Pizza Hut. --ApolloBoy 05:44, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete no brainer. ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  05:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN branch of restaurant chain Jamie (talk/contribs) 06:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. JHMM13 (T | C) [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px| ]] [[Image:Flag of Germany.svg|25px|  ]] 06:41, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, major chain of restaurants. AFD is not cleanup, so let's not inflict more systemic bias than necessary. Kappa 08:17, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The organization is notable.  The individual franchises are no more notable than the mom and pop restaurants they drive out of business. Durova 10:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Mom and pop restaurants would be notable if they had 380 branches and annual revenue of 381 million dollars. Kappa 10:28, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Then why is this only a three line sub-stub? Merge with the parent corporation. Durova 23:04, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * It's a 3-line stub because of systemic bias, which I already mentioned. Kappa 23:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep obviously this is about more than just a local Pizza Hut... but should be moved to Pizza Hut Korea, no? If it never expands beyond a stub at some point it might be merged to Pizza Hut.  --W.marsh 14:46, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kappa, bloody huge corporation. - Randwicked 15:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Just to clarify, this isn't a deletion on Pizza Hut, it's a deletion on a branch of Pizza Hut. karmafist 23:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 16:24, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep $381 million turnover and growing fast. Calsicol 19:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please to stop systemic bias here Yuckfoo 21:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see anything notable about it. James084 23:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into Pizza Hut. Not big enough or notable enough yet for an article of its own, but would be a valuable addition to info on Pizza Huts as a whole. karmafist 23:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge IntoPizza Hut. Barking about systemic bias is just plain (not going here so as not to invoke WP:NPA). D e nni &#9775;  03:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - the chain is notable, not the individual franchise. Can we stand 5000 articles on individual McDonalds franchises and 8000 Subway franchise articles? I think not. Instead, I'd suggest entering this -- and more -- in a section entitled "International Pizza Hut partnerships" in the Pizza Hut article. This should be sufficient to deal with Yuckfoo's claim of "systematic bias." B.Wind 04:59, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Individual McDonalds franchises don't pass WP:CORP. They don't make their own products which are distributed in several other countries. When they change their security systems, it doesn't get covered in ZDnet. Kappa 06:13, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep no brainer. -- JJay 18:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is not about a franchise, it's about a national subsidiary. --Pc13 17:31, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like an article that can definitely be expanded and is notable enough to expand. Really should be stubbed more than anything else. Tom Foolery 21:00, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, preferably rename it to Pizza Hut in Korea or something like that. Hankook is the romanisation of "Korea" in Korean. Mr Tan 18:16, 28 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.