Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanna Jonasson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. No solid evidence for the claim of significant coverage has been presented. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Hanna Jonasson

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject does not seem notable—all the cited sources do not provide significant coverage, and are instead about Assange, Manning, or Assange's cat. Remsense 诉  19:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Law,  and Internet.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: What does Assange's cat do for this person's notability? She's quoted in the article.. I don't see anything about this person that we'd use for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 23:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC) *

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:31, 21 March 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: We really need an uptick in participation at AFDLand. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Article was made because of red link by @BilledMammal It doesnt matter if articles are about Assange, Manning, or Assange's cat because Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. and If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability Softlem (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I disagree in this case, I don't think the sources amount to Jonasson's notability. Remsense  诉  17:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete She doesn’t satisfy WP:SIGCOV. She only receives trivial mentions in texts about Assange’s cat.Contributor892z (talk) 06:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.