Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Bayman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  02:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hannah Bayman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable news presenter. Appears to be largely a resume, LinkedIn post or the like. No sources found Oaktree b (talk) 23:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and News media. Oaktree b (talk) 23:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * No sources found? BBC, Chronicle Live, Hexham Courant, Northern Echo are all valid sources. J97736 (talk) 17:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The article for Hannah Bayman should not be deleted. it has valid sources and she is a notable broadcaster. J97736 (talk) 20:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Someone added sources yesterday. BBC articles are not independent (her employer). Other articles are mostly insignificant. "Hannah Bayman was spotted in public yesterday. Just thought you would want to know!" From this I can conclude that she is well known to a select audience, but these sources don't do much for the rest of us. BruceThomson (talk) 02:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Sources in the article are either promo or primary (or both). Nothing from IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BEFORE showed more promo. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability: (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  01:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, Article lacks Reliable Sources, fails Wp:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 11:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Overall fails WP:GNG and secondary sources are missing NP83 (talk) 20:41, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.