Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Kent-Martin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence of notability via WP:GNG was presented. j⚛e deckertalk 15:50, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Hannah Kent-Martin

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Declined PROD. References have been added, but subject does not seem to pass the threshhold for journalists. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 18:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article is the only article by User:Madamchutzpah.  Kent Martin boasts a catalogue of awards, from local media awards to national and international awards for ground-breaking undercover investigations.  If references are provided for this we may be in business.  Sussexonian (talk) 00:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete - though you would expect someone like this person, with alleged glowing credentials, to have an online presence, I can't find one. Maybe this is because she works undercover! Either way, I've searched under Hannah Kent-Martin, Hannah Kent and Hannah Martin and can't see anything to convince me she meets WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 20:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of these mysterious awards. I wouldn't expect someone with a 7-year career to have too many awards, but I would expect major awards from the past 7 years to be covered online (there are a lot of minor awards in most fields but as a rule of thumb if an award gets no press coverage then it's not important or noteworthy).  She seems a run-of-the-mill reporter: exposing low standards at a university and appearing on somebody else's radio show aren't reasons to get a WP article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.