Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Louise Mickleburgh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. no evidence of notability. I do not intend to userify,as there is no possibility of this becoming an acceptable article at this time. When there's more material and good references, then will be the time to rewrite.  DGG ( talk ) 04:29, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Hannah Louise Mickleburgh

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I previously speedily deleted this article, which is about a teenage actress whose work appears to have been mostly in local theater productions. The article was later restored, but the only sources cited are a database with a birth record (proving that the subject was born, I guess), and her own resume (not an independent source). The article claims that the subject is "most notable for her role in 'Sitting on Walls' (2012 short)" -- a film not listed in the Internet Movie Database, although it can be found on YouTube, where it was uploaded 5 days ago and has garnered only 23 views. In short, the subject's notability has not been clearly established. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Deserves an A7 - there is no indication of any importance or notability, and it is an unsourced BLP as well. Wer900  talkessay on the definition of consensus 01:59, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete certainly, as not notable, whether it deserves to be speedied, I'm not sure. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:14, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Per WP:BITE, shouldn't this AfD be let to run its course, rather than being speedily deleted? -- Trevj (talk) 11:20, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I earlier added this to the talk page by accident - When the page was speedily deleted, I was told that if I just added an introductory sentence saying explicitly why she should be included on Wikipedia then it would be accepted. I have seen the short film and I thought it was really good; its also been entered into film festivals/ competitions. If the consensus is that the article should be deleted then that's that but as she's meant to 'up-and-coming' the least we could do is leave it. I've found it hard finding reliable sources as believe it or not she's from the North of England and there really isn't much scope for up there. - I'll now add that, if it's allowed or whatever, I'll move it back to user. Is that ray? --Tropzax (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I have now added a link to some Imperial dance results; as she achieved either an A or B, I have stated that she is appraised as talented. I want to know if you approve of this (as I highly doubt you'll agree that it makes the article better). --Tropzax (talk) 16:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Eeurgh, should I move the page to userfy and, if I do, when I select 'move' do I move it to 'User', even though that'd be the page of a user, or another option? --Tropzax (talk) 16:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Tropzax, if the article is deleted following completion of this discussion (as appears to be the case), there is no problem in asking an administrator to temporarily userfy the article to your userspace for improvement. — Cactus Writer (talk) 02:00, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. If her only notability is one YouTube, then, no, doesn't belong in Wikipedia, doesn't at all meet WP:NOTABILITY. Softlavender (talk) 23:05, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete -- article fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. There appears to be no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. — Cactus Writer (talk) 01:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.