Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Mitchell Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hannah Mitchell.  MBisanz  talk 01:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Hannah Mitchell Foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

From my research I can see that the Hannah Mitchell Foundation is a real initiative (it does not appear to be legal entity), I can't see why it is notable enough for Wikipedia. Although it has issued policy ideas in the past, none of them seem to have reached any wider impact. At least, not that I can see. In many ways, it looks more like a blog than a think-tank. I think it is largely a vehicle for the policy ideas of Paul Salevson. In summary, I nominate this page for deletion due to its lack of notability. Seaweed (talk) 16:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:07, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Does not come anywhere close to meeting WP:ORGCRITE. AusLondonder (talk) 17:58, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Hannah Mitchell, which in fact already has most of what we need. --Lockley (talk) 05:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.