Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Penfield


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD, etc. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Hannah Penfield

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Obvious hoax, but can't speedy without bowing before the Great God Consensus... —  iride scent   (talk to me!)  00:16, 6 October 2007 (UTC) whatever. you guys are not fun. is it ok if i put "this is not true" at the bottom and then me and my friends can continue to edit it for fun?Allmyjunk444 00:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense/vandalism. This doesn't even rise to the label of hoax. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Speedy Delete per CSD G1 A full length opera composed by a three-year-old. About la toilet. I need a few minutes to stop laughing. You probably should have speedied it for nonsense, but I guess it's better to be cautious.  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 00:26, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Read the note I left on Talk:Hannah Penfield and you will find the answer to your question.  NA SC AR Fan 24 (radio me!) 00:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.