Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Ruth Sison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Missvain (talk) 06:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Hannah Ruth Sison

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Low-notability beauty pageant contestant per WP:TOOSOON, not yet notable per WP:NMODEL or WP:GNG. Unplaced in 2014, third place in 2014, and 2015 contest is still in progress. No significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Dai Pritchard (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 09:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 09:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete perhaps it is too soon for the subject to have a stand alone article. Subject has received passing mention in multiple non-primary and non-secondary reliable sources however none that I would consider in-depth or rise to the level of significant coverage, thus failing WP:GNG. Furthermore, the subject has not won a major pageant thus are received a notable award thus fails WP:NMODEL or WP:ANYBIO.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 02:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as while winning the pageant might ensure the sort of reliable third-party coverage needed to pass WP:GNG, apparently only not winning has failed to yield sufficient coverage. If an editor can find such in-depth coverage of the subject, I will gladly reassess my !vote. - Dravecky (talk) 06:18, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.