Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Sandling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:23, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Hannah Sandling

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seemingly non-notable with a lot of achievements but no actual good sources as shown here, here, here and here (all mostly gossip and such). There's also not even not much at IMDb, and often if there's not much there, there's not much for Wiki. SwisterTwister  talk  03:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:04, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 01:08, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - one source that gushes but provides no evidence of the subject's notability, two that peripherally reference the subject and two deadlinks. Nothing supports notability.--Rpclod (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Significant coverage" is a WP:GNG requirement, one that certainly isn't met here.  She is noted in a handful of tabloid headlines, none of which accompany substantive articles.  North of Eden (talk) 02:42, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.