Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Wood (nurse)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) Andrew🐉(talk) 16:02, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Hannah Wood (nurse)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. KidAd (talk) 18:33, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Coverage in two separate works of biographical histories seems sufficient to me. - On an unrelated note, why has the poor woman's article been classified as "animal-related"...? -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:57, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Australia = kangaroos. KidAd (talk) 19:51, 21 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment – I have removed this article from the Animal delsort page. Not seeing a real reason why this discussion should be included there. North America1000 01:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * errant editor has been minnowed. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:29, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - Can't verify the coverage in the print biographical dictionaries, but they seem to be important enough to indicate a WP:GNG pass. Hog Farm (talk) 03:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. FYI - the NTDOB is available for free online in Google somewhere. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 04:45, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
 * just google "Northern Territory dictionary of biography", 1st hit is a pdf version (thanks to NTgov and CDU). Coolabahapple (talk) 00:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, this well sourced article reflects this. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  02:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep like most similar articles, just needs some attention and there is nothing to put question as to notability or sources at all JarrahTree 03:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, seems interesting. SarahSV (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.