Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah the usul

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect. The vote was for merge, but I see no space in the Neopets article for stuff like this, so I will make it a redir for now. Woohookitty 03:18, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Hannah the usul
Does a character from a card trading game belong in an encyclopedia? Personally I don't think so, especially when the article is so poorly written. Bobbis 30 June 2005 17:49 (UTC)
 * merge what is salvageable into list of Neopets. mikka (t) 30 June 2005 20:32 (UTC)
 * Merge to some related Neopets article. Not list of Neopets, though, because that's a list of Neopet species that users can create, rather than a list of specific characters in Neopia.  Though I'd really like to keep all of the Neopets stuff in its own articles if we have all of this Pokecruft lying around here.  How long is too long for the list of Neopets articles, anyway? --Idont Havaname 1 July 2005 04:55 (UTC) See below. --Idont Havaname 3 July 2005 04:14 (UTC)
 * Comment. There are actually three articles on Hannah the Usul: Hannah the usul, Hannah and the Pirate Caves, and Hannah (Neopets).  Hannah the usul, the subject of this debate, is copyvio and has now been tagged as such.  Hannah and the Pirate Caves is also copyvio and has been tagged as such.  Hannah (Neopets) is the only valid article of the bunch, and should probably just be merged back into Neopets. --Idont Havaname 3 July 2005 04:14 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.