Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannes F. Wagner


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 18:44, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Hannes F. Wagner

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Was deprodded due to Google Scholar counts, but all of the articles which are all under 300 citations, are not solo articles of his, so not sure this meets WP:NSCHOLAR.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. It's not necessary to have solo articles to be notable as an academic. It looks like his papers have alphabetical authors, so we can't infer anything from author name ordering. There doesn't seem to be much more to say than his publication record, but I think six publications with over 100 citations each should be good enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:19, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 17:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions.  Walwal20  talk ▾ contribs 18:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.