Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans-Jürgen von Cramon-Taubadel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The argument that his coverage amounts only to directory-type listings has not been rebutted.  Sandstein  08:55, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Hans-Jürgen von Cramon-Taubadel

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable military officer. Article is almost entirely unsourced and a search yields almost no coverage in WP:RS. Tagged for notability since 2016. Recently DePRODed without explanation. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. —Brigade Piron (talk) 16:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject is covered in several books including Jagdgeschwader 53 ‘Pik-As’ Bf 109 Aces of 1940; Jagdgeschwader 54 Grünherz and Bf 109D/E Aces 1939–41. Andrew🐉(talk) 17:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That's pretty dubious. I don't see how books which self-consciously consider themselves directories (especially with such a narrow scope!) can possibly establish notability, especially WP:SIGCOV. —Brigade Piron (talk) 18:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG, not an ace, just one of hundreds of thousands of WWII pilots. Mztourist (talk) 03:05, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Uhhhh: This must be the end page of Wikipedia. The !vote cliffhanger is staggering.  Gerald WL  11:04, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - it appears he had some coverage in books, but they appear to be passing references. Bearian (talk) 21:31, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.