Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans-Martin Leidreiter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 04:40, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Hans-Martin Leidreiter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A tribute like-article cited to a self-published book and primary sources. Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, one passing mention.

No de.Wiki article. Much of the content is about the subject's superior, Gustav Knittel. The subject is not a recipient of the Knight's Cross, so there's no suitable redirect target. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable per WP:SOLDIER. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- We have rather fuller details of his military career than in many articles on award-recipients, but there is nothing in the article to show he was more notable than any other junior officer. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:23, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Not enough proof of notability. Alternatively, I guess this article could be merged with Gustav Knittel.2602:30A:2ED1:2EE0:C75:A3A0:1702:11EA (talk) 19:38, 12 March 2017 (UTC)


 * You people are incredible, especially "coffman". It took me 20 years to research the full extend of the career AND crimes of Gustav Knittel and the men under his command but coffman butchered the Knittel article - deleting relevant info and insisting on adding a crime Knittel did not take part in - then deleted the article about German Cross in Gold winner Wawrzinek and now insisting on deleting the - first equally butchered - article about German Cross in Gold winner Leidreiter for being "tribute like". Sure, by all means go ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruimteaapje (talk • contribs) 20:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Nom's comment: Wikipedia is not a place to publish original research, which this article largely is. Same applies to the Kittel article; it relies heavily on primary documents and the same self-published book. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Just a junior officer doing his job. The German Cross was below the level of the Knight's Cross and we don't consider even that inherently notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable; being a part of the LSSAH and officer under Meyer, not enough for stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 14:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per above. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   19:53, 15 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.