Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Beckert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep - nominator has withdrawn the AfD. Pastor Theo (talk) 18:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Hans Beckert

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

All the information is in the main article --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 15:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Having read the arguments below, I am changing my vote to Keep provided some work is put into the article. I don't know enough about the subject to do it. As the nominator for the deletion, can I cancel the process, or do I need to wait for an admin to do that? --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 19:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Comment: The deletion history for this article is as follows: two requests for Speedy Deletion were placed on this page (21:57, 26 April and 07:45, 27 April), but the creator of the article User:Haroldcoxly994 (User talk:Haroldcoxly994) just deleted the tags with no explanation. A merger with the main article was suggested, but this tag was also deleted by the creator. A PROD was issued, but again the creator just deleted the tag. Now this is being AfD'd, as I see no other way to deal with this, as the creator will just delete any tags. Postscript: The creator's alternative ID User:Haroldcoxly has removed the AfD tag. I have undone his edit. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 15:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete/Redirect to parent article. Original editor now has block-evading sock at User:Haroldcoxly. Hairhorn (talk) 15:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It has been reported to WP:ANI. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 15:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The person is notable enough for its own article. -- 科学高爾夫迷 21:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Sound keep A pity about the socks. However, this particular notable characer has been the subject of study for decades. I have begun cleanup and required sourcing of the article.  Per precedent, there is enough for this article on this character to further grow and improve the encyclopdia away from the film article.  MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 23:32, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Clearly notable, lead character from seminal movie ukexpat (talk) 17:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.