Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Jørgen G. Gundersen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Hans Jørgen G. Gundersen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Couldn't establish notability. It's harder as he is Danish, but no Danish-lang article either. Has been tagged for notability for over six years, time for it to be resolved. Boleyn (talk) 20:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 02:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 02:38, 24 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. To me seems a clear keep. GS indicates very highly cited academic (eg: Gundersen, H. J. G. (1986). Stereology of arbitrary particles*. Journal of microscopy, 143(1), 3-45. 1500 citations). Mentioned in the timeline in our article on Stereology. A conference Future Stereology - In Honour of Hans Jørgen G. Gundersen here: http://thiele.au.dk/events/conferences/2007/futurestereology/. Also recipient of Novo Nordisk Prize http://www.novonordiskfonden.dk/en/content/novo-nordisk-prize. (Msrasnw (talk) 11:30, 24 August 2014 (UTC))
 * Keep. The career corpus is substantive. There is enough evidence of impact as regards multiple highly-cited papers, albeit in what may be a relatively highly cited field.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 13:34, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn Thanks for all your input, Boleyn (talk) 14:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.