Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Jørgen Lysglimt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:51, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hans Jørgen Lysglimt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The character lacks notability. He led a fringe political party that neither presented candidates for any office nor participated in public discourse during his tenure (to my knowledge); a research institute registered as a sole proprietorship (cf. https://w2.brreg.no/enhet/sok/detalj.jsp?orgnr=982770440) with a website that fails to load (cf. mises.no) and one that looks more akin to a sparsely used personal blog written in third person (http://www.farmann.no/). The only company listed in the article, Runbox, appears to be owned by Internet Upside AS (cf. domain records at https://www.norid.no/en/domenenavnbaser/whois/?query=runbox.no&sok=Search), which has had no income in the past three years (cf. http://www.proff.no/selskap/internet-upside-as/oslo/telekommunikasjon/IG75JFQ01PE/). To summarize, I see no evidence of the character's notability, aside from his ability to generate the odd newspaper article from press releases or contrarian positions (e.g. partaking in a panel boldly supporting Donald Trump for U.S. President, a fringe political position in Norway). The aforementioned articles are indeed possibly generated in large part by this very article as an indicator of his notability. Dysase (talk) 13:05, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, the thorough nomination said it all. Not a political figure at all, correct assertions about Farmann. Geschichte (talk) 13:19, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:52, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:46, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as clear advertising only barely hanging by shoehorned claims of other people and groups with whom he's worked, but none of it is actually significant. SwisterTwister   talk  05:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.