Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Jørgensen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nominator withdrew nomination. (non-admin closure) HurricaneFan25  &#124;  talk  16:44, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Hans Jørgensen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I searched Google and am unable to find any connection between anyone of this name and the Newa people of Nepal. That he wrote a dictionary of their language does not inherently make him notable. If in fact he was the anthropologist who first described them, that might make him notable, but the source indicated may not be making that claim.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)   15:27, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - added a review of his noted dictionary and a link to the entry on him in the Dansk Biografisk Leksikon which seems to me (with the help of Gtranslate) to satisfy notability. Searching for Jørgensen and tibet also seems helpful. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC))
 * Keep I am the nominator but at this point this is out of my hands. I am satisfied with the references added since I nominated this.   Blue Rasberry    (talk)   00:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article documents a significant impact he made to scholarly studies (enough to pass WP:PROF — note that Google scholar citation counts are not really useful for this timeframe and subject) and the Dansk Leksikon link added by Msrasnw provides us with enough verifiable content on him to write an article. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.