Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Peter Anvin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  13:15, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Hans Peter Anvin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

depends on primary sources and some sources are related to the biographed, violating WP:N which says: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" Biel  11:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. There's also a 1200 words long article in Vestmanlands Läns Tidning. accessible through sv:Mediearkivet. I've expanded the article somewhat using it as a source. /Julle (talk) 18:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep :
 * In other languages
 * &mdash;Jerome Potts (talk) 22:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * In other languages
 * &mdash;Jerome Potts (talk) 22:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * &mdash;Jerome Potts (talk) 22:36, 28 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment  Despite all this, it still doesn't prove notoriety.  "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"  Biel  23:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Julles improvements. It is a close call case indeed. But within WP:GNG in my opinion.BabbaQ (talk) 09:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, as it barely meets GNG thanks to Julle's improvements.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.