Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanseen Abdelnaby (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Hanseen Abdelnaby
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

I checked the two books cited and neither appears to contain any reference to this person. Google searches all seem to point back to wikipedia. (The article was kept following an AfD in 2006 but, I assume, no one actually looked at the cited books.) rgpk (comment) 15:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Note: Wikiproject Egypt notified (by AAlertBot). --rgpk (comment) 21:47, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - subject appears to lack "significant coverage" in reliable sources as is therefore likely not notable under the WP:GNG. This information could possibly be included elsewhere if a citation could be found, but it seems like there isn't enough for a stand alone article to me. Anotherclown (talk) 08:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)




 * Delete I can't work out whether it's systematic bias or hoax. either way, it's unsourced Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 09:46, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete due to failing WP:V, no prejudice towards towards re-creation if legitimate sources are found. Qrsdogg (talk) 19:37, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.