Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanson Logistics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:03, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Hanson Logistics

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Non-notable company, fails WP:ORG. All listed refs are either from the local paper or industry-only publications. &mdash; Chowbok  ☠  00:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I would say that the coverage listed under Notes and Notable Press adds up to enough to pass the general notability guideline. Local media and industry publications are generally reliable, and often do a better job covering specialized or local topics than the national media. - Eastmain (talk) 03:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources like Supply & Demand Chain Executive, Food Logistics, and Pacific Shipper sound like media of limited interest and circulation to me.  They may be reliable, they may be independent, but they aren't read by many people outside the trades they serve, and as such are no more useful to establish notability than coverage by a hometown newspaper is. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:38, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete average company doing average things. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.