Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hany Rambod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE-ish given the low input. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Hany Rambod

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Notability is not inherited from his clients duffbeerforme (talk) 13:02, 22 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:58, 30 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The subject is known for creating FST7, a contemporary fitness/muscle building technique. The sources (questionable RS) quoted in the article talk about FST7 and refer to the subject's involvement in its development. The subject Hany Rambod's background is an insignificant mention in any of the sources. In fact, two sources don't even have his name in the complete source. The subject is undoubtedly a multiple time award winner. But on GNG, there is hardly any source to qualify the subject. The closest the subject comes to notability is on ANYBIO, which notes that a person may be notable if "The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field". There are two issues here. One, is FST7 a "widely recognized contribution"? Second, is there any evidence that this has become part of the "enduring historical record in the subject's field"? Unfortunately, the answer to both seems in the negative right now. This might of course change in the future. WP:BIODEL mentions: "If a deletion discussion of any biographical article (of whether a well known or less known individual) has received few or no comments from any editor besides the nominator, the discussion may be closed at the closer's discretion and best judgment." The best judgement here seems to delete the article. Lourdes  03:29, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.