Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hao Hai Ren

Hao Hai Ren
Vanity, delete, jguk 22:38, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Unquestionably. Delete.  Postdlf 22:40, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

The above people are Zealots, the article is not finished, keep, J-Rodd 203.167.202.230 23:01, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * I am Willing to shave off my barnet to keep this page, Michael Cheesepuff Sutorious


 * Puerile vanity. Delete. -R. fiend 23:17, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Don't DELETE... This page is part of world history!!


 * A pox on you deletionist hippie creeps. I have created a user page in Hao Hai's name : User:Hao_Hai_Ren, but I suppose you will delete that too. It is because of people like yourselves that Wikipedia has become a joke in the community. For shame.


 * Delete. User:203.167.202.230 has certainly been busy editing this VfD page.  It's fine at User:Hao Hai Ren, it just doesn't belong in the article space. -- Curps 23:56, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the article and move the info to a new user page. Sockpuppets, please take note. - Lucky 6.9 00:02, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity, thy name is Hao Hai Ren.  Didyaevernotice how the less likely a page is worth keeping, the more sockpuppets come out of the woodwork?  RickK 00:34, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep I am disgusted by the blatent rascism of all those intending to delete this entry. DO NOT DELETE. Hao Hai Ren is a Kiwi/Asian hero!
 * Keep Ian - he is great. Why is everyone getting so worked up about this? Just don't look at the page if you don't like it... ooo what a suggestion...
 * Keep I am very troubled that the powers that be would want to delete this corner-stone of wellington history. How can this information be passed down from generation to generation if you hippes keep deleting these entries. have a heart ... keep the page! scobes (fight the good fight)
 * Delete and ban the sockpuppets. Gamaliel 01:42, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Regarding accusations of sockpuppetry, there are several of us (distinct people I assure you) that connect through the game gateway (203.167.202.230) - the creator of the page sent this around his colleages, and we expressed our outrage accordingly.
 * There's no way for us to verify that. We can only count votes which we know to belong to distinct people. Mgm|(talk) 09:18, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * VfD policy says that anonymous voters and user voters created after the nomination are typically considered null and void. Nothing personal.  Having said that, I vote delete. Segekihei 01:47, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Vanity, no claim to notability. JoaoRicardo 02:10, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 02:18, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity, fraud target. Gazpacho 02:57, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Look folks, I'm sure he's a great guy, but is he important/famous enough that encyclopedia users will want to look him up? Wikipedia pages can't just be ignored, they need to be updated and organised... look at Category:New_Zealand_people, does he really belong with those other people? Kappa 04:46, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, he'd be listed there were there not confusion as to which letter of the alphabet his name should come under. ^_^
 * Delete. Though maybe it ought to be saved somewhere as a canonical vanity page. --Calton 07:39, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. An undisguised joke. But my understanding is that sock puppets' and anons' and new users' votes do count. They just don't count very much. For example, if four or five people with strong contribution histories were unanimous on a course of action, no amount of argument from any number of newbies or anons would persuade me as an admin that consensus had not been reached - on the course of action decided by the contributors. I don't see how it can work any other way, and this way seems to work well. Andrewa 08:13, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons already listed. ping 09:05, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, already listed at appropriate user page. Mgm|(talk) 09:18, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * One of the best vanity pages I've seen, but vanity nevertheless. Delete. --Angr 16:08, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Your compliment is much appreciated.
 * Delete. Going to university in New Zealand at 16 is not very notable because of them starting primary school at 5. JuntungWu 16:57, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * keep You cretin, we start school at 5, then we have 6 years of primary school, 2 at intermediate, 5 years of high school, so most people don't get to university until they are 18 or thereabouts. Hao Hai's story is touching and inspirational. Retardedness, thy name is Juntung. 202.0.52.252 00:31, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable, vanity, sock-puppet supported. Jayjg (talk) 19:37, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hasn't it gone yet?  --Marcus22 20:08, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Philip 02:29, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is only a stub, it could grow into something quite magnificent. Just because someone isn't indexed by Google doesn't mean they're not notable. There's a world outside the Internet, people. dojun 18:51, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * It would seem that the majority of these fanatics beg to differ.
 * Delete. Sign up for an account and put it on your own Userpage instead, alright? ;) - Mailer Diablo 12:54, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the vanity, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Wyss 23:46, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rubbish. -- Necrothesp 03:57, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. For everyone's information I recently did a university paper on immigration and used a case study on Ian and his family. I searched wikipedia and came up with his info. It is useful to some people and is not just a vanity page. Keep your ignorant opinions to yourself please. (Scarlet)
 * Keep. This page is the highlight of this little chinese-kiwi boy's life. Enough said. (PMW)
 * Delete, obviously. GRider\talk 18:53, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant vanity, though he does apparently have a number of (real or imaginary) friends to vote for him. LizardWizard 01:34, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * Made me laugh. Love the pic. But until there is a Wikicomedia, I guess I'll have to vote to delete.  Shame though.  HowardB 08:15, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only claims to notability are unverifiable, and even if true, don't make this young person notable enough.  --BM 23:43, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)