Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapanese


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete as self-admitted neologism per WP:SNOW. Daniel Case 14:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Hapanese

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NEO, may not be notable.  Cool Blue  talk to me 00:44, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:V. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 01:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- unverifiable and non-notable neologism. -- Boricua  e  ddie  01:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable and not notable neologism. Oysterguitarist 03:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems to fail both WP:N and WP:V. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -- B figura (talk) 03:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete While I think this term is notable enough, it doesn't appear to pass WP:V. Better suited for Urban Dictionary. Faithlessthewonderboy 05:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The opening sentence of the article says it all: a recent neologism. Not notable. Realkyhick 06:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; recent neologism which does not appear to have any sources to back up its notability. --Haemo 07:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable and original researchDark Tea &#169;  11:34, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.