Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hapi ® (Herb's Acoustic Playground Instruments)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:41, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Hapi ® (Herb's Acoustic Playground Instruments)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unnotable trademark/product just this side of G11 WP:SPEEDY due to neutral tone. (Comment says it's the creator's first entry.) Clarityfiend (talk) 10:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

The Hapi article is my first attempt at adding a new item to wikipedia. I am somewhat familiar with using MediaWiki but definitely a newbie regarding submitting new content to wikipedia. I have added some additional content and several references to the article. Am I on the right track toward having the speedy deletion removed? Do I need more references and citations? Is this follow up comment in the right place? Computerjazz (talk) 12:27, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment You've improved it, but the references you've added aren't very strong (see WP:Identifying reliable sources and WP:Notability). The video, for example, is about the park, and only shows the instruments in passing, without even identifying them as Hapi. This isn't a speedy deletion by the way (it's an Afd), but this is the right place to defend your article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete plain and simple WP:ADVERT created by a single purpose editor. LibStar (talk) 14:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete® per LibStar's pithy and accurate rationale. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.