Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Cog


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:01, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Happy Cog

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional website content article. References are very poor and not even given enough independent coverage. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 07:52, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. North America1000 09:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * delete promotional article, terrible sourcing, this is the only RS presented. Even if they were notable, the present text requires WP:TNT - David Gerard (talk) 15:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete peer WP:PROMO with a good doze of WP:TNT. The lead unabashedly states: "Happy Cog’s influence is widespread due to Founder Jeffrey Zeldman’s well known work on establishing..." in a paragraph that is cited to the company's website. Delete as "corporate spam". K.e.coffman (talk) 05:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:57, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.