Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Hearts Fund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 19:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Happy Hearts Fund

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This outfit does not seem to have much going for it in terms of notability: this is really the only thing I found that discusses the organization, though--let's be honest--it reads like a press release and is hardly an example of real journalism. The rest of the coverage, as you will see in the article and in any Google search, is about a little snafu involving the Clinton Foundation, and while all that is really exciting (for some, for a while), those articles barely discuss the organization. As such, it's the equivalent of WP:BLP1E. There is probably a note on the organization in the founder's article, and that's all we need, with a redirect. Drmies (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom. All it has going for it is celebrity interactions and as an organization will no way pass CORP.  The Dissident Aggressor 16:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and draft/userfy - I couldn't even find much for the Bill Clinton controversy and my searches here, here, here and here found nothing notable. Excellent mission no doubt but not much for a more detailed article now. SwisterTwister   talk  05:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.