Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Hollow Boulevard


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dundee–Happy Hollow Historic District. Consensus that the topic is not notable. Any useful content will be accessible in the page history can be merged into the district article. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  02:02, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy Hollow Boulevard

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a non-notable street that doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. (Contested PROD)  Imzadi 1979  →   00:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Imzadi 1979   →   00:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions.  Imzadi 1979   →   00:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - a WP:RUNOFTHEMILL city street. Not passing GNG, not even a numbered route to redirect to. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable enough to merit an article in Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect or "Merge", to Dundee–Happy Hollow Historic District. There is some incoherence in how the article states it, but I believe it is meaning to assert importance in that it is the only essentially unchanged one, out of the boulevards that Horace Cleveland designed for Omaha.  Which explains or contributes to the National Register of Historic Places listing of the district.  Apparently it forms part or all of the western edge of the district, but is included in the district, and contributes to the name of the district.  "Redirect" is appropriate if there is no mergeable content.  "Merger" is correct if there is some need to develop the content article to properly receive the redirect (which I think is the case, actually, and I think the redirect should specifically point to a new anchor in the target article, where this boulevard is to be discussed).
 * AFD participants and closers are supposed to seek wp:ATD alternatives to deletion, and this is a good one available here. Closer can either implement proper merger or leave indication that the merger should be implemented. --Doncram (talk) 06:21, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Light merge to the historic district per . The last of the Horace Cleveland streets bit seems relevant for that article.  I agree that there doesn't seem to be enough to hold down a separate article for this, but a some of this content is reliably sourced and looks useful. Hog Farm Talk 07:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is one of a few Omaha area road articles that a new editor has created.  Most may not be notable, but if there's a target where any content should be merged, keep that in mind.--Milowent • hasspoken  17:49, 25 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.