Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harald Gaier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Harald Gaier

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources cited in the article do not meet GNG or BLP. None describe Harald Gaier in any detail, and a Google search did not turn up better sources. This seems to be an example of a promotional piece for a non-notable alt-med practitioner. Delta13C (talk) 09:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete sources in article are primary or secondary. Lacking third party coverage to meet WP:BIO.  LibStar (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * delete - as per nominator. Sources show that Gaier has written some material that has been published, including a book on homeopathy and a few articles and book chapters. He gets a passing mention in a newspaper article where a feature writer visits a private clinic where he is a director. I don't see that there is enough independent coverage in reliable sources here to pass WP:ACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 02:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.