Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harald Ofstad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:22, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Harald Ofstad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am unable to find any evidence that the subject of this article passes WP:PROF. Although the pages state that the subject has been a professor for 30 years and has participated in public debate, there is no evidence that this professor is notably influential. Triplestop (talk) 04:02, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, the fact that he made it to the Norsk Biografisk Lexicon means he passes WP:GNG.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The cited source makes notability abundantly clear, for example the first prose paragraph (after the parentage) and the last paragraph. Phil Bridger (talk) 11:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Definitely notable.  069952497a  (U-T-C-E) 23:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Our article doesn't say much, but notability (including several criteria of WP:PROF) is obvious after reading the source, even through Google translate. Nominator should have done that. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:44, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.