Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harald Seiz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:35, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Harald Seiz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Little evidence of en:wp notability, puffed-up references - and this is the toned-down edit. WP:BEFORE shows that most coverage of the subject is cryptocurrency sites and goldbug blogs, which aren't usable as demonstrations of notability. This appears to be a direct port of de:Harald Seiz, which is similarly bad for sourcing. Contested PROD. David Gerard (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 17:07, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. David Gerard (talk) 17:08, 15 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete dubious sourcing: blogs, PR-pieces, short book reviews, all appearing rather primary. Lacking substantial editorial coverage. The honorary title is poorly sourced (looks like PR) and has questionable relevance - something bestowed by a minor lobby group. The honorary doctorate is not sourced at all as far as I can see. Definite promo slant. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 18:29, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this may be wrong since everything I'm looking at is in German, but my review of the sources matches what both David Gerard and Jake Brockman have said in their delete !votes. SportingFlyer  T · C  23:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Definitely delete this page [Redacted BLP violation] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.13.104.49 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.