Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbans Srih


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Harbans Srih

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wholly unreferenced BLP, tagged for notability and references since April 2008. Appears to fail WP:MUSICBIO. لenna vecia  03:39, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 04:22, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:MUSICBIO states that a musician is considered notable if they're covered in sources independent of the subject - like for example - or has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e. an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable - which Srih has satisfied from a quick search. JulieSpaulding (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it says multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable. What other RS is there? Also, who are the notable acts on Acid Jazz Records label? لenna  vecia  19:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with you; there aren't any sources, but the part about releasing two or more albums on an indie label appears to be a valid constitution of notability too. I think that the bit about sources should be a mandatory criterion, not just 'if you don't satisfy this one, choose another from the list' type of thing. JulieSpaulding (talk) 03:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Other criteria still need to be verifiable, but in that case the sources just have to be reliable. Non-triviality no longer matters if sources are used to verify one of those other criteria. - Mgm|(talk) 09:38, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Right, but Acid Jazz Records isn't a major label. Their artist roster does not include "many" notable performers. لenna  vecia  05:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. per wp:musicbio and lack of sources. Niteshift36 (talk) 00:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - 1) We don't have multiple secondary sources. 2) The albums are not backed by reliable sources. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.