Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbaugh Bowl (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Redirecting a disambiguation page is unuseful. Stifle (talk) 15:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Harbaugh Bowl (disambiguation)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Harbaugh Bowl already redirects to Super Bowl XLVII and there are only two entries, making this a twodab situation. Beerest 2 talk 14:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Super Bowl XLVII. The 2011 game is already mentioned there as well. --みんな空の下 (トーク) 16:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Super Bowl XLVII Per above, the article itself is just the name, so redirecting is the best option. ///Euro Car  GT  22:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - AfD is the wrong venue for this, I think. Carrite (talk) 06:08, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * How? Harbaugh Bowl is already a redirect, so we need this to be delet. Beerest 2 talk 01:53, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment I agree with Carrite, AFD is not the right place for this discussion. Talk:Super Bowl XLVII seems to be a better location, this way we aren't limited by AFD standing rules and outcomes (which we won't get anyway).  I recommend Administrative Close (or nominator withdrawl) and re-open the discussion on the Super Bowl Talk Page.--Paul McDonald (talk) 17:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * OK, how is this wrong for AFD. This DAB needs to be deleted. Talking on the Super Bowl page wouldnt help with that. Beerest 2 Talk page 20:17, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Because this isn't related to article content, merely navigation and administrative directions. Possibly article naming conventions.  We're not discussing if an article named "Harbaugh Bowl" should be kept, we're discussing if we should keep the disambiguation page for two games that have been referred to as "Harbaugh Bowl" in the media.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:28, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You're joking I hope. DABs are routinely discuss at AfD. The desired outcome here is deletion. So really AfD is the perfect venue for this. Discussing on the talk page wouldnt result in deletion of this page. Beerest 2 Talk page 20:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
 * No I'm not joking. But after some research I've learned that I'm also wrong.  After reading up at Disambiguation, I see that "Although disambiguation pages are not articles, a disambiguation page may be listed at Articles for deletion to discuss whether the disambiguation page should be deleted."  Carry on, I'm going to go wash the gunk out of my eye.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article is just a dab of a redirect, and that dab isn't even that useful. buffbills7701 01:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The only page it is directly parallel with is Super Bowl XLVII. One page is not enough to need a disambiguation page. Should be deleted, and maybe slightly mentioned in the Super Bowl XLVII page. Adamh4 (talk) 22:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.